Apr
18
Gisele Bundchen, sans hunky beau Tom Brady, enjoyed a Friday afternoon lunch with a friend at Boa in Santa Monica.
The 27-year-old supermodel is set to follow in the footsteps of Elizabeth Hurley, Heather Graham and Beyonce Knowles as the latest love interest for Austin Powers in the fourthcompletely unnecessary eagerly-anticipated installment of the spy spoof flicks.
The Brazilian beauty apparently loved the script and is set to meet with Mike Myers to further discuss the role.
Myers has kept relatively tight-lipped on the details of the film but said that, 'it's from Dr Evil's point of view, so if you balanced how much it was Austin with Dr Evil, it's more Dr Evil than Austin.'
I can't wait to see what kind of wacky name they give her character. What about Ima Phelator? Just a thought.
The 27-year-old supermodel is set to follow in the footsteps of Elizabeth Hurley, Heather Graham and Beyonce Knowles as the latest love interest for Austin Powers in the fourth
The Brazilian beauty apparently loved the script and is set to meet with Mike Myers to further discuss the role.
Myers has kept relatively tight-lipped on the details of the film but said that, 'it's from Dr Evil's point of view, so if you balanced how much it was Austin with Dr Evil, it's more Dr Evil than Austin.'
I can't wait to see what kind of wacky name they give her character. What about Ima Phelator? Just a thought.
The trial balloon that Bunchin is ready to "star" in an Austin Powers movie is bunk.....
read the facts from the man who knows.....
http://snarkerati.com/movie-news/writer-claims-no-austin-powers-4-on-way-rumours-totally-made-up/
Digital Spy are reporting that Michael McCullers, the writer of the previous two films in the comedy spy series, has rubbished the claims, saying he has no knowledge of any new film.
“I don’t know. I see those rumours like everyone else. I think a lot of them are just rumours. I had not heard that particular rumour.”
“I wait for the phone to ring on that one, you know what I mean? That’s my role in that.”
Which begs the question: Where did The Boston Globe, who originated the story, get their information from? I’d suggest that whoever it was deserves to be ignored from now on.